I
was lying in the tent on the second night of our trip around the
Tabletop Track, in the “Top End” of Australia, pretending the
drone of mosquitoes, doing their best to push through the tent
screen, bothered me not at all. As it so happens, I had just wrapped
up, to channel my inner Brit, a rather uninspired attempt at some
word puzzle. In response to my demonstration of an almost complete
lack of knowledge of the English language, the wife asked me “Do
you think you're smarter than me?” I, to my credit, fought off the
ever-hungry male ego and resisting answering “Of course”. If I
hadn't been feeling quite so knackered from our arduous tromping
through the scrub that day, I would have responded with a question:
“How do you define 'smart'?”
It
is a question I have considered before: what does “smart” mean?
You might be tempted to think of it like pornography: “you know it
when you see it”. But I don't think it is so simple. Chou Lu
recited pi to 67,890 decimal places. Some savants can do
extraordinary mathematical calculations in their head. Remarkable as
those feats are, does that make them as smart as Newton? Richard Feynman? An American teenager Tim Doner speaks more than 20 languages. Is he
smarter than Marie Curie? Was Michelangelo smarter than Beethoven?
All of those folks have accomplished feats that clearly required
intelligence, but how does one compare them?
Compared
to most people, I seem to find mathematics relatively easy. I did a
Masters in physics, so I also do OK at physics. I am reasonably
mechanical – I can figure out how most things work, and on occasion
can even fix a broken piece of equipment.
Languages,
however, are another matter altogether. On a few occasions over the
years, I have taken a reasonable stab at learning French. Sadly, I
have very little to show for my efforts. If you've got this far in
this very first of blog posts, you're undoubtedly thinking I should
have become fully proficient in English before attempting to add to
my résumé, and I would have a hard time arguing that point.
Wife loves scrabble; I'd rather play chess. She can do crosswords for
days at a time; I would rather put hot pins in my eyes. You see, my
dearly beloved's question wasn't exactly apropos of nothing. While
nine times out of ten, I can easily best a garden gnome in a battle
of wits, she was suggesting that perhaps it might not be a bad idea
to practice my language skills a bit, in the hopes of at least
slowing their inevitable age-induced decline. Point taken.
But
I am not a word person. Word games hold the attraction of a root
canal. So my answer to fending off impending illiteracy is ... you
got it, start a blog. I have no idea where this is going to go other
than it is destined to be yet another self indulgent series of
missives of interest only to the author's parents. And maybe not even
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment